Simon Rumley is a British filmmaker who for nearly two decades now has been making 'extreme dramas' in his own, uncompromising, dark, twisted, experimental style. His credits include THE LIVING AND THE DEAD (2006), RED WHITE & BLUE (2010), 60 SECONDS OF SOLITUDE IN YEAR ZERO (2011), and JOHNNY FRANK GARRETT'S LAST WORD (2016). His latest two films are FASHIONISTA (2016) and CROWHURST (2017), the latter executive produced by Nicolas Roeg and the former dedicated to him and made in his style. FASHIONISTA is a bold, experimental, supremely dark drama that gradually reveals its secrets and becomes more disturbing and poignant. CROWHURST tells the true story of Donald Crowhurst, an amateur sailor who in 1968 entered an around the world yacht race and was never seen again. In the first part of a two part interview, I spoke with Rumley about the films he loved growing up, his early short films, and how his love of Nicolas Roeg impacted upon CROWHURST and FASHIONISTA.
What films did you
love growing up?
I was a child of the
VHS revolution. In the village where I grew up there was a video shop
near my Dad's office. I would go there once a week to rent a film,
sometimes with my parents and sometimes alone. Back then, films
definitely had certificates but nobody really cared what an 11 or 12
year old boy took out. It could be something incredibly violent or a
'video nasty'. I saw everything from THE CHAMP (1978) and KRAMER VS.
KRAMER (1979) to THE EXTERMINATOR (1980), TAXI DRIVER (1976) and THE
EVIL DEAD (1981). I had no idea what I was renting. I would just look
at the cover and think ''That looks cool. '' On the other hand, I
would also go the cinema and see fairly commercial fare. I was a big
fan of the John Hughes films. I remember seeing HOOPER (1978) with my
Dad, STAR WARS (1977), STAND BY ME (1986) and films like that. As I
got into my late teens I started erring towards slightly darker stuff
and horror films but not exclusively. I was into Clive Barker and
films like HELLRAISER (1987), which left a strong impression on me.
When did you first
start to develop a taste for darker films?
I think I've always
been attracted to the dark side. When I was about 11, my maths
teacher showed the class THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE (1974) because
he couldn't be bothered to teach! He also showed us ZOMBIE FLESH
EATERS (1979). Another time on a barge holiday, when I was probably
even younger, I watched THE OMEN (1976) late at night on TV. My
parents wouldn't have let me stay up that late to watch it at home.
We watched it on an embankment in Windsor was literally a hundred
meters from where someone had been murdered weeks before. All of
these things affected me in various ways and I guess I was being
introduced to the best horror films at a very young age. There always
seemed to be a lot of foreign films on TV too, and a lot of Bunuel.
Foreign films were always attractive because they quite often had a
bit of nudity!
When did you begin
making short films?
When I was 19, sometime
in my second year of college, I literally woke up and thought ''I
want to be a film director. '' After that there was nothing else I
was interested in really. I went to University and studied Law but I
didn't have a burning ambition to be a lawyer, although my parents
would have liked it if I had become one. I borrowed a Super 8 camera
from the Film Club at University and made my first short film, which
like most of my short films had no dialogue. It was about a guy
ditching his girlfriend for a hairdryer. I made another short film,
and then for my 21st birthday my parents bought me a video
camera, which at that time was relatively unusual because there
weren't so many on the market. I made a few short films with that
camera, and then after I got a job in London at a post-production
edit house I started making 'proper' Super 8 short films with music
and some sound design, but still no dialogue. I made my first short
film with dialogue in it when I was about 24, and I messed about for
another five years making more short films.
Were most of these
short films in the horror genre?
They were more like
dark dramas to be honest. I usually describe the kind of films I make
as 'extreme dramas'. I did a trilogy called Smiles, Laughter and
Insanity, which I shot on Super 8, and were all in black and white.
One was about a homeless man with mental issues who was living on the
streets of London., another one was about a guy who hires a
prostitute to murder him, and the other was just a fairly wacky
couple talking. This was around the last hurrah of the American Indie
Movement, when Quentin Tarantino did RESERVOIR DOGS (1992), Kevin
Smith did CLERKS (1994) and Robert Rodriguez did EL MARIACHI (1992).
The filmmaker that inspired me the most was Richard Linklater. I
watched SLACKER (1991) and realised that you can make a film
practically without a story and still have a film. It was a big
influence on what became my first film, STRONG LANGUAGE (2000). My
first three films, STRONG LANGUAGE, THE TRUTH GAME (2001) and CLUB LE
MONDE (2002), form a loose trilogy like his first three films do.
From THE LIVING AND THE DEAD. I have been making the kinds of
films I am now better known for.
Where do you think
your psychological approach to telling dark stories comes from?
I don't know, really.
It's not like my Dad was a psychiatrist or anything. It must be
innate. My psyche is always drawn to darker things. It's something
that I am working on changing, but with little luck to be honest. I
don't think Steven Spielberg grew up wanting to be a commercial
filmmaker. I think he just makes the films he's interested in making.
How much would you say
Nicolas Roeg was an influence on your work? You dedicated FASHIONISTA
to him, and he executive produced CROWHURST.
When I was 18 or 19 I
was dating a girl who lived in Notting Hill, and sometimes I would
stay over and we'd watch films at the Electric Cinema. They always
seemed to have Nicolas Roeg films showing. I saw the likes of DON'T
LOOK NOW (1973), BAD TIMING (1980) and PERFORMANCE (1970), and loved
them. I was a massive Bowie fan, so of course THE MAN WHO FELL TO
EARTH was also big for me. That period from PERFORMANCE to THE MAN
WHO FELL TO EARTH was particularly jaw-dropping. His films are
dangerous, very intellectual, psychological and sexual. They're
beautiful to look at too. As I made more and more films, I found
myself going back to his films and thinking ''I would love to make a
film the way he does, but I don't know how he does it. '' That
complete non-linear structure and also the subject matters he is
attracted to. It was always in the back of my mind that I would make
a film in his style.
Mike Riley, the
producer on the film, knew him and it was my idea to ask him to come
on board. It turned out that in the 70s, in the heyday of his career,
Nic had tried to get a film about Donald Crowhurst off the ground.
Before I met him I rewatched a lot of his films because it had been a
while since I had seen them. I spent a few hours a couple of times in
his study discussing the script with him. He gave us some good notes
on the movie once he had seen it, and we took them on board.
How did FASHIONISTA
come about?
I thought my next film
would be a project called Black Friday, but I got a lukewarm
reception when I showed people the script I had written. I tend to
get responses that are either ''Wow'' or ''That's a piece of crap'',
so I was a bit concerned. I thought long and hard and decided to go
back to the drawing board and think about doing a script in the style
of Nic. I refashioned and restructured Black Friday into FASHIONISTA.
Definitely. CROWHURST
was a linear script but we did chop and change things around in the
edit.That whole section at the end with all the visuals of what might
have happened to Crowhurst came from our discussions with Nic. That's
actually one of my favorite parts of the film. Going into
FASHIONISTA, his films were still very much in my mind and as Black
Friday wasn't quite working I thought ''If I'm ever going to do a Nic
Roeg movie, now is the time, whilst his spirit is still with me. '' I
wasn't quite sure about how to go about writing the script, though. I
would have liked to have spent time asking Nic a lot of questions but
I didn't want to overstep the boundaries of his generosity. Nic had
said to me ''The finished film is never the same as the script'', but
actually I am more like Hitchcock in that once I have a script,
although we may lose a few scenes or bits of dialogue here and there,
what you see on the screen is pretty much the script. If I gave you
the script to FASHIONISTA, it's pretty identical to the final film.
CROWHURST changed quite a bit, but a lot of that was because of the
problems of filming on water. With FASHIONISTA, I sat down for three
weeks and wrote it in a non-linear frame of mind. It was quite
liberating writing it because I could put whatever I wanted wherever
I wanted. I could use the non-linear structure to enhance the drama
and the tension. In my opinion, if I had told FASHIONISTA in a linear
fashion, it wouldn't have been as exciting.
Part two of the interview.
Thanks to Chris O'Neill.
FASHIONISTA is out now digitally in the US and the UK.
CROWHURST is out now in theaters in the UK.
Simon's website.
Interview by Paul Rowlands. Copyright © Paul Rowlands, 2018. All rights reserved.
Part two of the interview.
Thanks to Chris O'Neill.
FASHIONISTA is out now digitally in the US and the UK.
CROWHURST is out now in theaters in the UK.
Simon's website.
Interview by Paul Rowlands. Copyright © Paul Rowlands, 2018. All rights reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment