Mark Pellington's versatile, fascinating resume as a filmmaker includes the paranoid thriller ARLINGTON ROAD (1998) with Jeff Bridges and Tim Robbins; the horror mystery THE MOTHMAN PROPHECIES (2002) with Richard Gere; the innovative concert movie U2 3D (2007); the offbeat, thoughtful comedy HENRY POOLE IS HERE (2008) with Luke Wilson; the unforgettable, coruscating I MELT WITH YOU (2011) with Rob Lowe, Thomas Jane and Jeremy Piven; and his latest film, the comedy drama THE LAST WORD (2017), with Shirley Maclaine and Amanda Seyfried. Getting his start in MTV, Pellington is also one of the most exciting, innovative music video directors working, with U2's 'One' and Pearl Jam's 'Jeremy' amongst many memorable, game-changing highlights. He also directs short films and documentaries, and executively produces the TV mystery series Blindspot. The breadth of his work across different formats speaks to his talent, passion and great interest in the world around and inside him. In the first part of a three-part interview, I spoke to Pellington about the early years and how he became a filmmaker, the genesis of his 'One' video for U2, and his experiences making his debut GOING ALL THE WAY (1997), and ARLINGTON ROAD.
I can't say that I'm a
filmmaker that was weaned on movies and who grew up saying ''I want
to be a filmmaker.'' I think I fell into it. But I do remember
seeing, at an age earlier than I should have, STRAW DOGS (1971) and
NETWORK (1976). Those were the two biggest movies that shook me up.
They weren't like the typical movies I would see with my friends at
the time. JAWS (1975) and THE EXORCIST (1971) also had a profound
impact on me. The first film I saw that made me think ''Wow, this is
a world that I might be interested in creating'' was BLUE VELVET
(1986). It powerfully transported me to a place. I was 24, living in
New York and was two years into working for MTV, immersing myself
into the world of visuals in a serious way. But even then I had no
dreams of being a 'filmmaker'. I was interested in music and collage
and editing.
I did an internship
there after my third year of college in 1983. MTV was about a year
and a half old. I lived in New York for the summer, and I was really
gobsmacked by the city and the music and the art. My whole world was
just turned upside down. I was lucky enough to get a job with MTV
after I graduated from college as a production assistant on on-air
promotion.
Yes, I was. I am from
Baltimore, Maryland. My father played pro-football, but I was kind of
like a preppy jock, really into punk rock and New Wave music, which
went against what was expected of me. I just loved that music,
starting in 1976, when I was about 14. It really spoke to me, and
that fuel really set me apart from the other kids. Music just guided
me. I wanted to write about it or be an AR person for a record
company. That was my interest.
Did you quickly find
you had a talent for music videos and collage?
In my first year at MTV
I was going to these edit rooms and audio suites. I ended up being an
assistant, lugging tapes to studios where people were putting
together stuff. MTV taught you to mix the audio and the voice and all
the music and cut picture to it, so that foundation in 'audio first'
was how I was trained. I made a promo when I hadn't even been there a
year. I watched every video that came in, and at that time it was
like twenty videos a week. You would look at them and see these
really great shots and powerful images. They weren't the really
mainstream videos that MTV was playing. I would cut them all together
as one piece and put some text over it and make my own thing. It was
a collage, but at the time I didn't even know what a collage was. I
didn't know anything about Dadaism or John Hartsfield or anything
artistically. But pretty quickly after living in New York I got
turned on to William Burroughs and within a year I had immersed
myself in cut-up theory. I found that the idea of chopping things up
felt good to me and I just kept on doing it. I did my first video in
1986, and at that time MTV would let you direct videos at the
weekends. I had success directing videos with people like De La Soul
and others, and before I knew it, I had a reel.
I left MTV in 1990 and
I had done a show for MTV and Channel 4 in London called Buzz, which
was a 30 minute collage show. I did a bunch of stuff for U2 because
they were fans of Buzz. And then 'Jeremy' was a big success. It was
the first video I ever did that had any degree of narrative.
After 'Jeremy', did
you start to think that directing films would now be an option?
People started calling
after 'Jeremy', and I did have a screenplay that I was writing that I
wanted to make. I had also already done a documentary about my father
and his struggle with Alzheimer's, and I spent two years travelling
the country making these beautiful short films about poets for a TV
project. In 1995 I was 31-32, I had gotten married and I decided that
making a movie was going to be my next challenge.
Would you consider
yourself a restless person given the different genres and formats you
have worked in and continue to do so?
I don't think it's
restlessness. I just love doing different things. If I just made
movies, I'd be in trouble because they are harder and harder to get
made, unless I just make any script that they send me. I think my
career has just evolved from one thing to another. I will always do
videos because I love them, and they are very subconscious and they
are free. But after doing a bunch of them and working on the abstract
you want to work with actors and play with story in a different way.
So my career and my body of work and my art are all intertwined. I've
had successes and I have had missteps. I've made movies that I loved
that were annihilated in the press. In my personal life, my wife
passing away changed my art and my being and what I was interested
in. The next thing you know, I'm in my 50s. I hope when I'm in my 70s
I can look back and see that I had the chance to make a lot of the
things I have in my brain and on my computer.
I did a bunch of stuff
for them for Zoo TV. I did three songs worth of material for the
video screens. About a month after I had finished they sent me the
song 'One' from Dublin and said they needed something for a video. I
made images of flowers, of text and of buffaloes looping. They asked
me to make it into one single-screen video. We tried intercutting
with footage of the band but that didn't work. The version with the
buffaloes was just one of three versions we made. I got the
inspiration from a still they sent me of buffaloes falling over a
cliff, and Bono saying it was about love. We found stock footage of
buffaloes, we blurred the footage and slowed it down, and it took on
a life of its own with the song and the edit.
Was moving to feature
films an easy transition for you?
It was very difficult
actually. I wish I had done a short with just a master/ close-up/
close-up, using the basics of film grammar. My first movie, GOING ALL
THE WAY, was a coming of age comedy and I really learned a lot on
that. Film is a different beast, a different pace. If I knew then
what I knew now! But everybody's got to make their first film and go
through those growing pains.
I learned not to shoot
132 page scripts. I have a three and a half hour assembly of the
film. I'd love to recut it and make a new version of it. I learned to
listen to my AD and people that had made movies before. I was the
most stubborn first-time filmmaker on that movie. I learned a million
things. But I have to say it was fun making it.
Did you find you had a
natural affinity with actors after doing so many videos?
I had also worked with
poets and I had done commercials, and I did not feel uncomfortable
talking with actors. My casting director was a wonderful woman named
Ellen Chenoweth, who brought in tons and tons of young actors. It was
a Who's Who of people who have gone on to great things. They would
come in and afer they had read, I would pick their brains and learn
from them. Ron Eldard, who had just done Barry Levinson's SLEEPERS (1996),
came in, and I was trying to describe something to him. But I had
never studied acting or theater and I was struggling with the terms.
I ended up playing him a piece of music. He said ''You know, a
director can use any tool at their disposal. There's not just one way
to direct. '' To this day, I remember that as a good piece of advice
because it loosened me up to just be myself. I knew the script, I
knew the story, and I knew the characters, so I could just be myself.
My storytelling skills have improved over the years, and it's only
over the last few years that I feel like I've mastered that side of
it. Something clicked in.
I see ARLINGTON ROAD
as one of the most underrated films ever.
It was a great script
and a great movie. I was very lucky to have fallen into that. I was
in the right place at the right time. I worked really hard on it. It
was a big step going from a $3 million movie to a $22 million movie
with movie stars. I recently saw it again for the first time in many
years. It's very straight, and static and controlled; probably more
so than I would do now, but that was then.
What was your initial
reaction to the script?
I was horrified by the
opening. I think the way we used the sound and the score in the film
added even more to the horror of it. The ending was just a fucking
punch to the stomach. My heart was beating and I thought it was going
to head one way and then the rug just got pulled out from under me.
Did you encounter any
resistance from the studio to change the opening and the ending?
A European company,
Polygram, financed it, and they were cool with the way it was
written. But we did end up having to shoot two alternative endings.
In one of them, Jeff Bridges gets pulled away, and his partner, the
black FBI agent, opens the trunk and Jeff was the culprit. I thought
it was a complete joke and I only shot one take of it, with a grip
stand and a ladder in the shot. The producer said ''Just shoot it, so
we can say we did it contractually. '' The scripted ending that Ehren
Kruger wrote was that Jeff's kid ends up living with Tim Robbins and
Joan Cusack. We tested it and it was perfect, but it tested really
badly with women who said ''You killed the hero, and the villains
take away his kid. Are you kidding?'' So we went with the other
ending, where at least the kid goes to live with some relatives.
We offered Tim Robbins
either role, and he chose the villain because it was a shorter amount
of time and he had never played a villain before and thought it might
be fun. We all put our heads together and came up with Jeff for the
lead role. He was very 'cool' at the time as opposed to 'hot', but we
all loved him and had huge respect for him. He was amazing in the
film, and is a great guy that I am still in touch with. I learned a
great deal from him.
What were some films
that you looked at when preparing the film?
The only movie we
watched and studied was ROSEMARY'S BABY (1968), which we did over and over
again. I've learned it's better to study one or two movies really
well than to try and study twenty movies. On some of my TV work I
don't like to look at anything else at all, and just go with my gut.
Part two of the interview.
Pellington's website.
Interview by Paul Rowlands. Copyright © Paul Rowlands, 2017. All rights reserved.
Part two of the interview.
Pellington's website.
Interview by Paul Rowlands. Copyright © Paul Rowlands, 2017. All rights reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment